Talk:SCP-682/@comment-44667114-20200304141145/@comment-45164900-20200304185102

Thing is that SCP-682 is always protected by plot armour and anyone can just bring up a way SCP-682 can survive any other SCP trying to attack 682. For example:

SCP-682's acid tub would probably develop a thick coat of acid (Certain types of acid can prevent corrosion) on 682's skin which will probably cancel out 106's effect, That and also because 106 only targets humans from 10-25.

SCP-682 can swim through space (As seen when 682 was sent to the sun and literally came back into the Earth unscathed) so SCP-123 wouldn't phase 682 much.

So it's not really a matter of thinking up of actually dangerous SCPs,It's a matter of how the writer poorly write SCP-682/How the writer decided to anomalize 682.